Monday, August 31, 2009

Not the "Type" of Two Factor Authentication we Need...

An article written two years ago (August 17th, 2007) blasted online banking log-in procedures and still, nothing has changed...even though they mention using true two-factor authentication as a solution way before it got as bad (fraud) as it is today...

Banks are still using the "type" of authentication that hackers love. What type is that? You know what the Hellvetica I'm talking about. The kind you use when you don't swipe!

I thought it might be interesting to "revisit" what was said two years ago in order to demonstrate that online banking has not progressed, while hackers unarguably have.

"A new financial services requirement calling for two-factor authentication should make online banking secure, but one researcher says it's actually making things worse. At this year's DefCon gathering in Las Vegas, security researcher Brendan O'Connor outlined several scenarios in which online banking has gotten worse, rather than better. Under Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) guidelines that went into effect at the end of last year, banks are required to provide some form of multifactor authentication of their customers.

That typically means asking the user to provide , something you have (an ATM card), something you know (a PIN) (Editor's Note: where did "typically" go when it comes to online banking/online shopping? Sounds like a "swipe" vs. "type" argument to me...or something you are (a fingerprint scan). (Editor's Note: Been there, done that)

However, O'Connor,found that the new authentication implementations were no better than the traditional user-name and password that were required prior to last year. (which, BTW is why I always utilize "username" "password" in my rants against typing.

O'Connor also shared some insight into why, with all these new protections in place, so many phishing sites are still operational today.

FFIEC--what?

Nearly two years ago, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) recommended guidance on authentication for online banking. According to their Web site "The Council is a formal interagency body empowered to prescribe uniform principles, standards, and report forms for the federal examination of financial institutions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and to make recommendations to promote uniformity in the supervision of financial institutions." O'Connor, who isn't an expert on compliance, said that failure to pass an FFEIC audit could make it hard for banks to acquire smaller banks or institutions.

"The guidance specifically says that transaction fraud and identity theft are a problem, and it places the blame squarely on authentication," said O'Connor. ." He pointed to the "three strikes--you're out" rule with most Web applications. Guess the wrong password and you're locked out until you get on the phone to someone. "Attackers aren't getting in by guessing, they're getting in by stealing the credentials or tricking the end-user into giving away the credentials." So adding more credentials won't make sites more secure. (Editor's Note: EXACTLY! A user can "type" in 20 credentials and if a keylogger gets a hold of it, or they have malicious code on their computer, or if they type it into a counterfeit bank website, they are screwed. So authentication isn't the problem. Typing is!)

	The [FFIEC] guidance specifically says that transaction fraud and identity theft are a problem, and it places the blame squarely on authentication I disagree with entire premise Editor's Note: Here Here. It's the "type" of "authentication" that creates the problem. More specifically...Consumer's "typing" authentication instead of "swiping" to authenticate their online banking session!.

The trouble with credentials

Choosing the answer to a security question isn't two-factor authentication; it's one factor--it's choosing something that only you know. But is it? O'Connor said it depends on the question. If it's public record data, then an attacker might also know the value of your mortgage or the year you graduated from college. If it's personal information, then pick a good question to answer. O'Connor mentioned Paris Hilton's choice of "What is the name of your pet?" Everyone knows that.

Then there are the oblivious choices, such as "What's your favorite city?" "If your user ID is CubsFan123," said O'Connor, "it's probably Chicago." Likewise, he said if your user ID is NYCgal576 then the answer to "Where did you go to high school?" is probably New York City.

Editor's Note: Duh! Ya think? So, what can we do? How about encrypting the data so that hackers just find random gobbledygook. "If they were properly encrypted, it would take until the sun burns out for anyone to decode it."

Read "two year old" article in full at CNET

Over 70% Concerned About Mobile Security

Security still a concern for e-commerce in RP

Smart beefs up security in payment service

By Alexander Villafania - INQUIRER.net

MANILA, Philippines – Buying items online or through mobile phones is still a relatively low activity in the Philippines, even when there is gradual growth in Internet and mobile users.

At present, according to Nielsen Philippines, there are about 20 million Internet Users in the Philippines, mostly in urban areas. Another 70 million are mobile phone users.

While there is huge potential in both the online and mobile world, fraud and identity theft remain to be barriers to growth of both e-commerce and m-commerce.

Even in countries such as the US, many people are still apprehensive to buy online much less use their mobile phones to make purchases.

A report by US-based ABI Research showed that over 70 percent of those interviewed about mobile transactions are still concerned about security

Continue Reading

From ABI Research: Mobile Money Security

Challenges and Solutions The security of the mobile channel is perhaps the greatest impediment to the exponential growth of mobile money services worldwide. Consumer perception is that mobile is not safe for personal financial services.

All three mobile delivery options -- SMS, mobile Internet, and downloadable applications -- pose security risks. For mobile money services to fulfil their potential, mobile money service providers must find the proper balance of security and convenience for consumers. What are mobile money vendors and mobile money service providers doing to ensure security? This Brief details specific actions being taken today by leading mobile money service providers and vendors, and makes recommendations for specific actions that need to be taken to ensure security.

UAL's Interchange Pass Thru in For a Fight

Travel agents fighting United Air fee plan

Bloomberg News

Aug. 31 -- U.S. travel agents are asking Congress to prevent United Airlines from forcing some to pay credit-card processing fees on ticket purchases, saying it may raise costs for travel businesses and millions of customers.

United said in June it was making the change because of transaction expenses that have risen to several hundred million dollars annually. United had planned to begin levying the fees last month, and extended the start date by 60 days.

Some agents will have to absorb the costs when customers buy with Visa Inc., MasterCard Inc., American Express Co. and other cards. Ten states including California and New York bar agents from passing along to consumers the card surcharges, which are usually 2 percent to 3.5 percent of the purchase price, said Paul Ruden of the American Society of Travel Agents.

ASTA wrote to the Congressional sponsors of pending legislation to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration on the subject of so-called "back-to-gate" time limits for delayed passenger flights. In the letter, ASTA requested that Congress establish a clearly-defined time limit beyond which passengers who have been subjected to lengthy on-board tarmac delays must be permitted to return to the gate and exit the delayed aircraft. The legislation was reported out of a key Senate Committee last week, and is slated for a vote in both chambers of Congress later this fall.

ASTA wrote to the Congressional sponsors of pending legislation to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration on the subject of so-called "back-to-gate" time limits for delayed passenger flights. In the letter, ASTA requested that Congress establish a clearly-defined time limit beyond which passengers who have been subjected to lengthy on-board tarmac delays must be permitted to return to the gate and exit the delayed aircraft. The legislation was reported out of a key Senate Committee last week, and is slated for a vote in both chambers of Congress later this fall.

In the letter, ASTA said:

In the face of continuing delays and the evident lack of concrete efforts on the part of the airlines to create a meaningful solution thereto, and absent a robust reporting mechanism that would compel airlines and airports to report back to the Department of Transportation on their actual progress in implementing the recommendations in the Task Force's [National Task Force to Develop Model Contingency Plans to Deal with Lengthy Airline On-Board Ground Delays (Tarmac Delay Task Force)] final report, we see little hope for real progress in this area without further action from Congress.

Therefore, we respectfully ask that you establish a clear standard for the airlines to follow. A Congressionally-defined standard will not in itself solve the inexorable problem of chronic flight delays, but it will surely represent an improvement over the current system, in which people are trapped on planes without adequate supplies for hours on end.

On Nov. 12, 2008, the Tarmac Delay Task Force, on which ASTA held a seat, concluded nearly a year of debate about how to deal with inevitable major flight delays that strand passengers on aircraft for periods up to eight or even 10 hours. Among the Task Force's recommendations was that each airline be permitted to establish its own time limit at each airport for deplaning passengers who have been subjected to lengthy delays. In addition, the Task Force recommended that delayed passengers be provided with "regular and timely information" concerning the reason for such delays.

See full Letter to U.S. Congress

See full Letter to the U.S.Senate

ABOUT ASTA

ASTA's (American Society of Travel Agents) mission is to facilitate the business of selling travel through effective representation, shared knowledge and the enhancement of professionalism. ASTA seeks a retail travel marketplace that is profitable, growing and a rewarding place to work, invest and do business.

United Airlines, Visa, MasterCard, UAL Corp, American Society of Travel Agents

44% Less Likely to Trust eCommerce Than Last Year

The shifting of consumer behavioral attitude towards a "more secure transaction" such as the one's provided by HomeATM's 2FA 3DES DUKPT E2EE solution is gaining momentum. In fact, 44% of consumers are less likely to trust a Web Merchant with their personal data than just one-year ago. It's only a matter of time before "everyone" realizes that financial transactions must be conducted "outside the browser space."

Here's a snippet from Network World:

Network World - Consumers are increasingly interested in doing business with companies they know and trust while avoiding the criminal elements that stalk the Internet.

In fact, 60% of online shoppers abandon their carts at some point during their shopping experience, mostly due to fear of identity theft (Sherpa Marketing Study, 2006), and almost half (44%) say they're less likely than they were just a year ago to trust a Web merchant with personal data (Yankee Group Study, 2008). As the climate of trust erodes, consumers are more sensitive than ever.

Continue Reading (Don't Be Insecure)

Backlink Test

Make Money Online | Money Blogging Tips

HowHero

Find Torrent Search Engine

Indo Contest

Mga Kwentong Ma Alamat

Contest Love

It Blood

I Heart Contest

Nurse Jen Doll

Your Web and Graphics Design

My Blog Contest

Prize King Contest Blog

Computer Collections

Medan Blogger

Eiffel Tower

Programming the Life

John Doro Dot Com

Paco Contest

Couch Surfing Host

Erick's Blog

My Life 4 Hire

The Spirit of Blogging

EmTNester

Amori, poesi, arte, chat

Great Wall of China

The Painted Veil

FeeFiFoto Blog

I am Harriet

Phoenix2Life

Anurag Bhateja

Online Treasure

Gorilla Sushi

London Eater

News n' Tech Palace

Sherry Rambling

Blogging Tips and Tools

Selbst Management

Skip Ratt

Eljon

Heart Net

Just 4 You

Widgets For Free Blogger Widgets

Bubble Crush

GoGalavanting

Mesothelioma Cancer Help

How Things Do

Hardware Rig

Reality View

Utah Web Design

Hero Help Tutorials

Nub Lag Teh Server

Jobs Human Resources

Naeem's Blog

Facts For History

Prasdikatama

McPhee-Env

PeriPheryPoem

Writings of RYU

Heart Net

Cater Hater

Tech Recipe

Tech Boy UK

Internet Leashed

Tha Good Life Reviews

Solaris Photography

bSaves - Saving Energy Search Engine - Black Google

Sitfu

The All Rounder

The Science of Getting Richer

University Results

Surigao Digital Services

Senior BabyBoomers

Gazlo

Jessi & Ray Dream Life

Life Around Raymond

Susan Boyle

Get Any Thing

Exclusive Arena

The Star Girl

Tem Bolog

Trash XP

How Hero - How to Tutorials - Video Tutorials

Blog Darma

Money Central Online

Watch Free Online Movies

Zoom Your View

Hey I Want a Job

Dog Pet Grooming Supplies

Aqualux Carpet Cleaning

All about the Beautiful Game

Communicate Your Emotions

Vemma Kuantan

Online Global Biz

Home Affiliate

News to Me

Google Gadget Games

High Point of the Day

The Biggish

Tech Feast

Cake and Bread

Home Cleaning Tips

Fitness Excercise

Funny N Cool Pix

D Bucks

Fow Furniture

Dubious Ma

Mami Bizi

Fundo Geek

Nijan Translator

Core Worlds

Dance Music Ireland

A Blog for All

Golf Swing Pro

AFpaintball.com

Top Money Making Websites

Bunny Exclamation

V2 Tricks

Make Money Online - Comple Exercise

Kits Kingdom

Daily Blog

Financial Planning with Chris Pua

Work At Home

Awesome Tech – A blog dedicated to Tech-News

RohitComputers

Superplaystationstore

Joeedmund

Yooray's Blog

Feisublog - Anime blogs and Forums

LUMIXiOUS

imanes27.blogspot.com

Best on Tube

Dubai Moves

ViJeshKirodian

Demystifying the East

MyFundoo Blog

Jobconstruction

http://yatabe84.blogspot.com/

Cash Crate

Bucks N Blogs

OMG LaGigel

Vintage Shirt | Vintage Jeans

http://chickylounge.blogspot.com

Hack A File

PIN Payments Blog

See the original post where you can sign up at MoneyBush.blogspot.com

Don’t forget to promote this article via social networking and word of mouth.. It only means better results for yourself and everyone on the list.

HomeATM Provides the "Inevitable" Solution Now

HomeATM: "Inevitably For Our Own Good"

Here's an excerpt from an article written by Rhodi Mardsen which unequivocally states the reality of what it takes to secure online banking and credit/debit card transactions conducted online. It's the ~~economy~~ typing stupid! Don't Type: Swipe!

HomeATM encrypts the card details so that hackers only find "random gobblygook" and manufactures the "only device" designed for eCommerce to be PCI 2.x Certified. We did it because "it's for your own good." The shift towards everyone using a HomeATM to conduct secure transactions and online banking continues...

There is a worldwide standard (the PCI-DSS) that any companies dealing with cardholder information are obliged to sign up to, but many security experts have pointed out that it's possible to tick all the PCI's boxes and still be insecure. The offence allegedly committed by Gonzalez is as vivid an illustration of that as one can imagine.

For once, this lapse in online security has nothing to do with us, the general public. We're guilty of all manner of stupidity when it comes to our personal financial security – writing down PIN numbers on Post-it notes, using the word "password" as our password (or typing "anything" into online banking sites or merchant checkout) just because we are "instructed to.") – but in this case there's nothing we could have done, save for withdrawing entirely from the 21st century and using cash instead.

So what should these companies be doing to protect us? Graham Cluley, (sounds like he has one...Clu that is) from internet security firm Sophos, has expressed his disbelief that our card details aren't encrypted when they're stored, so that hackers just find random gobbledygook. "If they were properly encrypted," he says, "it would take until the sun burns out for anyone to decode it."

Editor's Note: HomeATM believes that they shouldn't even be stored. This is why HomeATM instantaneously encrypts the card details (including the Track2 data). By doing so the Internet Retailers (IR) never store it, in fact never even handle it. This provides three distinct benefits. 1. It keeps the data safe, 2. instantaneously places the IR within the realm of PCI compliance and 3. protects the IR from significant fines which would be levied against them by V/MC in the event of a breach. Those are three pretty significant benefits...but first, we have to eliminate typing.

But it's not just the companies storing our details that need to shape up. The 130 million stolen credit card numbers would be of no use to anyone if they couldn't be used to buy stuff. Any masterminds wouldn't have been the ones picking a card number and using it to buy soft furnishings on eBay; they'd sell the numbers on to other criminals in blocks of a few thousand. But eventually, someone would pretend to be you and use your money, because it's still disconcertingly easy to do.

Online shopping is a click-happy cinch, but with that convenience comes risk; if you can tap out your 16-digit number, expiry date and a supposed "secret" three-digit number on the back of your card to book a flight to the South of France, so can anyone else.

"We may balk at the idea of carrying around an additional device (of the kind Barclays customers now have to use for online banking) to enter our PIN every time we make a credit card purchase online, but when these kind of measures are inevitably introduced, we'll have to grin and bear it. It's for our own good, after all.

As for the likes of Alberto Gonzalez, they're talented individuals capable of writing sophisticated software that can detect weaknesses in even the strongest computer defences. Indeed, such characters frequently find themselves with job offers in the industry following their release from prison. But after a 35-year stretch, technology is likely to have marched on a bit too far for anyone to catch up. Marched on so far, one would hope, that our money would finally be safe from marauding cybercriminals. Fingers crossed.

^{Source: Independent}

Fraud Necessitates the Need to Track Consumer Credit Card Purchases

Credit-card companies track your purchases to make sure you and they aren't scammed

Sunday, August 30, 2009 3:42 AM

By Steve Wartenberg

THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

Pat Kastner | Dispatch illustration

At noon, you use your credit card to pay for gas at a station in Columbus. An hour later, your card has been used to buy a $1,500 computer -- at a store in Moscow.

Before the charge is approved, a sophisticated computer-monitoring system thousands of miles away raises a red flag, denies the charge and keeps you from becoming the victim of a crime -- all in a matter of seconds.

Such technology used behind the scenes to thwart criminals has become the norm in the ever-evolving, techno-savvy and secretive world of credit- and debit-card security. It's a world filled with sophisticated and well-organized bad guys determined to steal your identity and card information -- and equally determined card issuers and networks bent on stopping them.

The card industry includes financial institutions such as Huntington and JPMorgan Chase, which issue credit and debit cards that are serviced by electronic payment networks. The two biggest are Visa and MasterCard. Discover and American Express also issue and service credit cards.

At stake in their combined fight against criminals is billions of dollars. Identity theft netted crooks about $48 billion in 2008 in the United States, a 16 percent increase over 2007, according to Javelin Stategy & Research.

Of this total, about $22 billion was realized from fraud connected to existing cards.

Most cardholders have zero liability for fraudulent activity, so the fraud is likely to cost them mainly time and inconvenience. Editor's Note: So that balance between security and convenience is what again?...and whose convenience? It seems to me that if $22 billion worth of fraud creates "monetary loss" and "time and inconvenience" for consumers, that we need to re-evaluate that balance. Yes? That's without considering the fact that consumer privacy is past-tense now that every purchase is "tracked." Why not process (E2EE) transactions the "right" way instead?

Instead, the card industry and merchants are on the hook for all those billions, which is quite an incentive to limit their losses. The card industry doesn't like to discuss the details of how fraudulent card activity is monitored and detected. "If they became public, they wouldn't be effective. It would only aid the fraudsters," said American Express spokeswoman Lisa Gonzalez.

Continue Reading at Columbus Dispatch

Australian Retailers Association Concerned with EftPOS Fees

ARA concerned at RBA review of interchange regulation > Inside Retailing

Eftpos interchange fees cannot be consistent with debit card fees according to the Australian Retailers Association.

The ARA and the Australian Payment Merchants Forum (AMPF) say they are concerned at a Reserve Bank of Australia proposal to subject Eftpos interchange fees to the same regulation as Visa and MasterCard's debit cards.

Chairman of the AMPF and ARA executive director, Russell Zimmerman, said interchange fees were typically paid by merchants to card issuers to fund the costs of cardholder benefits. But the RBA's suggestion would increase the cost of Eftpos transactions for all Australian retailers.

"Currently, Visa and MasterCard interchange fees are regulated to be an average of 12c per transaction but it's difficult to understand why card issuers should receive 12 cents for each Eftpos transaction.

"Debit cards are a mature product and the cost of processing transactions using Eftpos is minimal. In fact in New Zealand, whose banking market is dominated by the major Australian banks, debit card payments at retailers do not attract any interchange fee.

"Consumers, who use less costly payment instruments, including Eftpos cards, effectively subsidise consumers paying with more costly payment instruments like scheme-branded credit and debit cards. The RBA's latest proposal will price every debit card payment at the highest existing rate," Zimmerman said.

Continue Reading

eftPOS, AMPF, ARA, Debit Cards, Russell Zimmerman

Brazil Suspends VisaNet's Exclusivity Ban

VisaNet Says Brazil Antitrust Agency Suspends Exclusivity Ban - Bloomberg.com

VisaNet Says Brazil Antitrust Agency Suspends Exclusivity Ban

By Laura Price

(Bloomberg) -- Cia. Brasileira de Meios de Pagamento, the credit-card payment processor known as VisaNet, said Brazil’s antitrust regulator suspended a ban on exclusivity imposed by the Justice Ministry.

SDE, as the antitrust arm of the Justice Ministry is known, started a probe against VisaNet, Visa International Service Association and Visa do Brasil Empreendimentos Ltda on Aug. 6. The antitrust unit said VisaNet created exclusivity by requiring businesses to use it to be able to accept cards carrying the Visa logo.

Cade, as the antitrust regulator is known, suspended the preventive measure taken earlier this month by SDE until Cade judges the case for possible anti-competitive practices, VisaNet said in a statement to Brazil’s securities regulator late yesterday. Cade is due to judge the case on Sept. 16, VisaNet said.

VisaNet, SDE, Cade

Momentum Payment Systems Announces Mobile Payment Processing with New iPhone Application

Download this press release as an Adobe PDF document.

Merchants of Momentum Payment Systems can now process credit and debit card transactions through its secure network by employing an iPhone, iPod Touch or T-Mobile G1 over Wifi or 3G wireless connections.

Addison, TX (PRWEB) August 31, 2009 -- Momentum Payment Systems, www.MomentumPayments.com, a leader in the electronic payment processing industry, proudly announces the Momentum Payment Systems iPhone Mobile Application.

Small business merchants, independent contractors and mobile merchants now have the ability to utilize Momentum's payment processing solutions without the need for hardware processing equipment or a dedicated internet line.

The application is currently available through Momentum's sales team and is set up via a one-time installation process through a web browser. Upon installation the application icon is available on the home screen of the device for convenient future use.

With the application, merchants can type the card information into the phone and the credit and debit card transactions are processed as "card-not-present" or "offline-debit" payments.

Receipts can currently be emailed to the cardholder however future enhancement plans include the ability for the merchant to print a receipt instantly.

"We've always been dedicated to creating customized payment processing solutions to fit the needs of each business," said Vice President of Operations Robel Sebany. "We've always wanted to provide our merchants with access to a payment processing option as portable as their business and with the growing technological advancements of these mobile devices it is a great opportunity to reach that goal."

About Momentum Payment Systems

Momentum Payment Systems, LLC is a fast growing merchant acquirer that specializes in providing small and medium-sized businesses throughout the United States with comprehensive electronic transaction processing solutions. Momentum distributes and installs point-of-sale equipment and offers traditional credit and debit card processing services as well as processing for ATM cards, gift and loyalty cards, prepaid cards, EBT, checks and e-commerce solutions. Momentum also proudly offers 24 hour technical support.

For further information, please visit Momentum Payment Systems online at www.MomentumPayments.com

###

The State of CyberCrime - BitPipe.com/TippingPoint

From: BitPipe.com

and Search Security.com

The State of Cybercrime: Today's Real Cybercriminals

Sunday, August 30, 2009

PIN Payments Blog on Zimbio

The PIN Payments News Blog is now also available on Zimbio under the Wikizine:

ePayments News

Or, continue to read the advertisement

free version here at:

www.HomeATMBlog.com

or

www.PINDebit.blogspot.com

HomeATM: "Inevitably For Our Own Good"

There is a worldwide standard (the PCI-DSS) that any companies dealing with cardholder information are obliged to sign up to, but many security experts have pointed out that it's possible to tick all the PCI's boxes and still be insecure. The offence allegedly committed by Gonzalez is as vivid an illustration of that as one can imagine.

For once, this lapse in online security has nothing to do with us, the general public. We're guilty of all manner of stupidity when it comes to our personal financial security – writing down PIN numbers on Post-it notes, using the word "password" as our password (or typing "anything" into online banking sites or merchant checkout) just because we are "instructed to.") – but in this case there's nothing we could have done, save for withdrawing entirely from the 21st century and using cash instead.

So what should these companies be doing to protect us? Graham Cluley, (sounds like he has one...Clu that is) from internet security firm Sophos, has expressed his disbelief that our card details aren't encrypted when they're stored, so that hackers just find random gobbledygook. "If they were properly encrypted," he says, "it would take until the sun burns out for anyone to decode it."

But it's not just the companies storing our details that need to shape up. The 130 million stolen credit card numbers would be of no use to anyone if they couldn't be used to buy stuff. Any masterminds wouldn't have been the ones picking a card number and using it to buy soft furnishings on eBay; they'd sell the numbers on to other criminals in blocks of a few thousand. But eventually, someone would pretend to be you and use your money, because it's still disconcertingly easy to do.

Online shopping is a click-happy cinch, but with that convenience comes risk; if you can tap out your 16-digit number, expiry date and a supposed "secret" three-digit number on the back of your card to book a flight to the South of France, so can anyone else.

"We may balk at the idea of carrying around an additional device (of the kind Barclays customers now have to use for online banking) to enter our PIN every time we make a credit card purchase online, but when these kind of measures are inevitably introduced, we'll have to grin and bear it. It's for our own good, after all.

As for the likes of Alberto Gonzalez, they're talented individuals capable of writing sophisticated software that can detect weaknesses in even the strongest computer defences. Indeed, such characters frequently find themselves with job offers in the industry following their release from prison. But after a 35-year stretch, technology is likely to have marched on a bit too far for anyone to catch up. Marched on so far, one would hope, that our money would finally be safe from marauding cybercriminals. Fingers crossed.

^{Source: Independent}

You Say You Want an Evolution?

Fraud Schemes Evolving Payments Instruments

While some of the latest schemes borrow from scams
past, today’s fraud schemes are as sophisticated as banks’ most
advanced payments systems. And stopping them is still a challenge.

By
Maria Bruno-Britz - Bank Tech

Evolving Fraud Schemes Keep Pressure on Evolving Payments Instruments

Retail Payments Risk Forum Collaborates to Fight Payments Fraud

The SEPA Direct Debit Scheme and the Payment Services Directive Pose Challenges and Opportunities

Name a payment method and there is probably some scheme to defraud it.

Since the Chinese introduced paper money,
banks have been concerned about fraud. More than a thousand years
later, payments fraud continues to haunt banks, consumers and
businesses.

"Fraud is still rampant," comments Paul Sussman, VP with First
Manhattan Consulting in New York. "The majority of businesses over $1
million in revenue are going to be exposed to payment fraud, and almost
every bank is being hit by fraud today.

From simple "Dumpster diving" to organized crime rings that rely
on complex computer programming, fraud scams grow in sophistication to
match the evolution of payment forms. "Fraud trends continue to
evolve," notes Douglas Twining, director of fraud services for
Cleveland-based KeyBank ($99 billion in assets)....

click box to continue reading this or other articles...

Saturday, August 29, 2009

FDIC: Online Banking Flawed

Online crime is increasingly hitting small and mid-size companies in the U.S., draining those entities' bank accounts through fraudulent transfers. The problem has gotten so bad that a financial services group recently sent out a warning about the trend, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued an alert today.

"In the past six months, financial institutions, security companies, the media and law enforcement agencies are all reporting a significant increase in funds transfer fraud involving the exploitation of valid banking credentials belonging to small and medium sized businesses," says a bulletin sent on Aug. 21 to member financial institutions by the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center, (FS-ISAC). The FS-ISAC is part of the government-private industry umbrella working with the Department of Homeland Security and Treasury Department to share information about critical threats to the country's infrastructure. The member-only alert described the problem and told its members to implement many of the precautions and monitoring currently used to detect consumer bank and credit card fraud.

The FS-ISAC notice -- and subsequent media attention -- in turn prompted the FDIC alert to warn banking institutions about this kind of fraud. The Threat

The FDIC traces the fraud to compromised login credentials on online banking websites. Over the past year, the FDIC says, it has detected an increase in the number of reports and the amount of losses resulting from unauthorized electronic fund transfers (EFTs), such as automated clearing house (ACH) and wire transfers.

Continue Reading at Bank Info Security

Special Alert from the FDIC: (whom I think needs to learn more about our 2FA 3DES DUKPT E2EE PCI 2.x HomeATM)

Special Alerts

SA-147-2009

August 26, 2009

TO:	CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SUBJECT:	Fraudulent Electronic Funds Transfers (EFTs)
Summary:	The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is aware of an increased number of fraudulent EFT transactions resulting from compromised login credentials.

The
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is alerting financial
institutions that provide Web-based payment origination services for
business customers to increased reports of fraudulent EFT transactions
resulting from compromised login credentials. Over the past year, the
FDIC has detected an increase in the number of reports and the amount
of losses resulting from unauthorized EFTs, such as automated clearing
house (ACH) and wire transfers. In most of these cases, the fraudulent
transfers were made from business customers whose online business
banking software credentials were compromised.

Web-based
commercial EFT origination applications are being targeted by malicious
software, including Trojan horse programs, key loggers and other
spoofing techniques, designed to circumvent online authentication
methods. Illicitly obtained credentials can be used to initiate
fraudulent ACH transactions and wire transfers, and take over
commercial accounts.

These types of malicious code, or "crimeware," can
infect business customers' computers when the customer is visiting a
Web site or opening an e-mail attachment.

Some types of crimeware are
difficult to detect because of how they are installed and because they
can lie dormant until the targeted online banking session login is
initiated. These attacks could result in monetary losses to financial
institutions and their business customers if not detected quickly.

Financial
institutions and technology service providers can refer to the
following guidance for additional information on authentication and
information security for high-risk transactions:

FFIEC Guidance Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment

Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment Frequently Asked Questions

FFIEC Information Security Examination Handbook - PDF 866k (PDF Help)

FFIEC Retail Payment Systems Examination Handbook

and

FDIC Guidance on Mitigating Risks from Spyware

Consumers who want to learn more about computer security and online scams can find additional information at http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/guard/index.html and http://www.onguardonline.gov/topics/overview.aspx.

Businesses and local government agencies can find cyber security resources at http://www.us-cert.gov/.

Information
about cyber-fraud incidents and other fraudulent activity may be
forwarded to the FDIC's Cyber-Fraud and Financial Crimes Section, 550
17th Street, N.W., Room F-4004, Washington, D.C. 20429, or transmitted
electronically to alert@fdic.gov.
Questions related to federal deposit insurance or consumer issues
should be submitted to the FDIC using an online form that can be
accessed at http://www2.fdic.gov/starsmail/index.asp.

For your reference, FDIC Special Alerts may be accessed from the FDIC's website at www.fdic.gov/news/news/SpecialAlert/2009/index.html. To learn how to automatically receive FDIC Special Alerts through e-mail, please visit www.fdic.gov/about/subscriptions/index.html.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Momentum Payment Systems Announces Mobile Payment Processing with New iPhone Application

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Disqus for ePayment News