Sunday, April 27, 2008

Where's the PIN? HomeATM has the Beef!

I'm curious as to why Wells Fargo would specifically quantify (in red below) the rates for Internet "Non-PIN Debit Card Sales"

By the way, those very same "Non-PIN Debit Card Sales" have the exact rates as "credit card sales...which is probably another reason I see to avoid even making the distinction.

Does Wells Fargo find it necessary to post NON-PIN Debit Card Sales rates unless they also, in tandem, had and provided a solution, and thus rate, for Internet "PIN Debit Card Sales."


This from Wells Fargo's Internet Merchant Account Site:

Internet Merchant Account Pricing



One-Time
Set-Up Fee1$99.00 per location
Monthly
Monthly Service Fee (per location)$31 per month
Annual Compliance Support Fee2$40 per year
Payment Gateway FeeIncluded
Online ReportingIncluded
Statement Billing Fee3 (paper statement)

$7.50 per month
Processing Fees
Discount Rate4 — Visa®, MasterCard®, Discover® Network2.40% on Gross Credit Card Sales
Discount Rate4 — Visa, MasterCard, Discover Network
2.40% on Gross Non-PIN Debit Card Sales


Authorization/EDC Fee5 — Visa (Credit and Non-PIN Debit), MasterCard (Credit and Non-PIN Debit), Discover Network (Credit and Non-Pin Debit)

$0.30 per attempt
Non Bank Card Authorization (American Express)$0.27 per attempt
Non Bank Card Capture Fee (American Express and American Express — split dial)$0.03 per attempt
Voice Authorization Fee$0.75 per attempt
Address Verification Fee6$0.01 per attempt
Chargeback Fee7$25.00 per chargeback
Voice (Manual) Address Verification Fee
$2.00 per attempt

Friday, April 25, 2008

2007 Online Retail Sales Surge to $175 Billion




Online retail sales in 2007 reached $175 billion, a 21% increase over $144.6 billion in 2006, according to a new report from Forrester Research Inc.

This is the first drop in growth after years of around 25% growth. And according to Forrester Research projections, it will be far from the last. The firm forecasts: $204 billion in online retail sales in 2008, 17% growth over the previous year; $235.4 billion in 2009, 15% growth; $267.8 billion in 2010, 14% growth; $301 billion in 2011, 12% growth; and $334.7 billion in 2012, 11% growth.

“While on the surface, declining year-over-year growth percents for online commerce may represent a maturation of the e-commerce industry, it is important to also recognize the industry will add approximately $30 billion in additional revenue every year for the next five years. This is a sizable amount,” says Sucharita Mulpuru, principal analyst, retail, at Forrester Research, and lead author of the report, “U.S. E-commerce Forecast: 2008 to 2012.”

The growth rate remains significant. And a variety of factors are driving it. “E-commerce continues its double-digit year-over-year growth rate in part because sales are shifting away from stores and in part because online shoppers are less sensitive to adverse economic conditions than the average U.S. consumer,” the report says.

But challenges lie ahead. The report cites three major hurdles e-retailers face as the growth rate of online sales decreases: most consumers still prefer stores, the web channel is becoming increasingly seasonal, and online shoppers tend not to browse.

“The in-store experience is, for most customers, categorically better: It is immediate, tangible and social. And by shopping in stores, consumers can touch and feel items, avoid issues surrounding returns, and avert pesky shipping costs,” the report says. “And seasonal businesses have notorious challenges in managing every aspect of their business, from their merchandise to their employees to their cash flow. These conditions could prove to be choppy waters for online retailers as the industry matures.” And while web stores offer a wide variety of products, online shoppers generally are not browsers, the report adds. “While catalogs can often serve to drive customers to new products or stores,” it says, “the spear-fishing mentality of most online shoppers means there is less opportunity for retailers to effectively drive higher average order values or units per transactions.”

To continue to grow their sales as the overall growth rate of online sales decreases, e-retailers must devise new strategies, Mulpuru says.

“Growing international sales is one opportunity, especially given the weakness of the dollar at this point in time,” she says. “And retailers still need to fix the user experience, employing more tools like rich Internet applications or alternative payments or more robust cross-sell tools. The user experience online still is largely subpar and improvement there alone can help many e-retailers grow.”

875 Million (and growing) Potential HomeATM Users!


Over 875 million consumers shopped online worldwide in 2007, according to a survey by The Nielsen Company.

This represents a 40 percent increase in the number of Internet shoppers over the last two years, the U.S.-based market research firm says.

“When Nielsen conducted its first global survey into Internet shopping trends two years ago, around 627 million people had shopped online,” Bruce Paul, Vice President of Customized Research at Nielsen U.S., says. “Within two years, this number has increased by 40 percent to 875 million.”

According to Nielsen’s survey, which was conducted in October 2007, over 85 percent of the world’s online population has used the Internet to make a purchase. Globally, more than half of Internet users made at least one purchase online in January 2008, Nielsen estimates.

Among Internet users worldwide, the highest percentage shopping online is found in South Korea. Nielsen says 99 percent of South Korean Internet users have shopped online, followed by the UK, Germany and Japan in joint second place, each with 97 percent. The U.S. came eighth, with 94 percent of Internet users having shopped online.

Credit cards are by far the most common method of payment for online purchases. Nielsen says that 60 percent of global online consumers used their credit card for a recent online purchase, while one in four online consumers chose PayPal. Of those paying with a credit card, more than half (53 percent) used Visa, Nielsen says.

Monday, April 21, 2008

ATMDirect Has (as of yet) Still Not Accepted the "PIN-OFF" Challenge...


From today's "Payment Daily News Digest"

HomeATM Prepared to Prove ATMDirect is Vaporware:

After reading this public "let's take it outside" challenge by HomeATM's CEO, there is little question that ATMDirect is either going to have to accept the challenge and prove their functionality or sue for libel. Reading between the lines, Ken Mages is frustrated with prospective clients holding up sales as they say they first want to check out the ATMDirect offering before making a decision. - Payment Daily News Digest
Editor's Note: It's not that HomeATM is looking to prove that ATMDirect is Vaporware. It's more along the lines of settling, once and for all, who has the superior Internet PIN Debit/Credit technology, in terms of functionality AND security. This is precisely the reason HomeATM has offered to have the "PIN-OFF" implemented by a panel of payment specialists. In addition to it's technology, HomeATM also feels that it's patent is strong enough to hold up in the face of any and all scrutiny.

Regarding the libel statement. Libel is defined as a: "a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression b: a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt.

There is nothing that has been said or written by HomeATM or this blog that is either "unjust" or "without just cause." I have, indeed, "questioned" the merit of their recent press release, but the reason for doing so is based on my background as a founding member of Pay By Touch. I "justly" questioned the merit of the press release because I was sent ATMDirect's confidential documentation, which was sent to all prospective bidder's prior to the ATMDirect auction. I saw absolutely no mention of "25 Global Internet PIN Debit Patents."

Of course, if there was indeed 25 global internet patents, and Iif missed that part in going and when going over the materials, I still believe it's "justifiable," (certainly not unjust) to question how strong they were since Acculink was able to obtain those patents (and the $500k-$750k worth of IBM Blade Servers)...for only $600k.

Although there is an occasional "deal" when acquiring a company through a bankruptcy auction, the purpose of an auction, especially a court supervised bankruptcy auction, is to obtain the highest possible bid. Therefore, the price the company receives at a bankruptcy auction is usually pretty close to it's value. So no libel here...just an "open invitation" to "PIN-OFF."

As I've stated before, ATMDirect claimed to "own PIN Debit on the Internet" so why would they not accept the challenge unless, as Payment Daily News Blog, so eloquently stated, they've got vaporware.

Personally, I don't necessarily believe ATMDirect is "vaporware", I simply am of the option that it's "nowhere" near the level of HomeATM's technology.

So...with that said, there's 23 days (and counting) remaining and we're still all waiting for ATMDirect to accept the PIN-OFF. They can name the time, and even the place, and do so by clicking here: ATMDirect Accepts HomeATM's PIN-OFF Challenge!

BTW: Nominations are now being taken by "Wired" for their 10th Annual Vaporware Awards ...if you can think of a nominee!

External Link: http://allpaynews.com

HomeATM Named Top 30 Innovating Elite - Blast from the Past

In an effort to bring HomeATM Blog readers up to date on some featured news articles about HomeATM, I am pleased to introduce our "Blast from the Past" feature.

Today's "Blast from the Past" features an article from last fall's Investors Daily News, recognizing HomeATM as one of Canada's Top 30 Innovating Elite Company's.

Here's the article from late last August...

MONTREAL, Aug 30, 2007 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Intent on showing its global entrepreneur and investor resources the "WOW" factor from North of the Border's innovative technology sector, Red Herring is holding its first Canadian conference--Canadian Innovation Illuminated -in Montreal.

Showcasing early stage disruptive technologies -- "Made in Canada" -- the event will feature a well-rounded list of guest speakers as well as "presentations from the country's the Top 30 innovators."


HomeATM -- the Montreal headquartered owner of a global patent for PIN debit and PIN credit card use in a browser environment -- has been chosen to present its paradigm shifting technology as a proud member of the Elite 30 Canadian Company Presentations group.

A very pleased Kenneth G. Mages -- Chairman and CEO of HomeATM -- announced the news today by saying, "We welcome the opportunity to have been selected to present our web-based 'trusted e-money eco-system' on not only a Canadian, but also an international, stage." Mr. Mages went on to say, "The HomeATM value proposition -- sustainable over the long term -- will be extremely compelling to the VC community and demonstrate our unique bottom-up Alternative Web Payment Solution business model, as well as our top-down next generation follow-up.

Taking Kenneth Mages' comment one step further, HomeATM COO Mitch Cobrin stated, "The rapid increase in internet penetration is fuelling a variety of consumer internet services and e-commerce opportunities witnessed by the rapid growth of such payment solution providers as PayPal and Bill Me Later. As customers and merchants seek a trusted, secure and convenient method to transact over the WWW this sector should see double digit growth through the next decade."

Canadian Innovation Illuminated is being held at Montreal's Hyatt Regency Hotel from September 5th through September 7th 2007.

About HomeATM:

Owner of the PIN-debit and PIN-credit authentication space in a browser environment through its global patent and of its patent pending 2nd generation wPCI(C) version aiming to turn any Internet-enabled device into a fully secured, bank "standard" transaction device, HomeATM can justifiably aspire to be a significant player in online financial services, payment solutions and remittance. Indeed, the solution is well suited to cannibalize market share from existing online payment processes, significantly expand the user base and increase FSI player presence in the online transaction space. More information is available at www.homeatm.net.

About Red Herring:

Red Herring magazine is a sophisticated insider's guide to the business of technology, featuring unparalleled insights on the emerging technologies driving the economy, from the Internet to wireless communications and digital entertainment. Red Herring's journalists report on how innovation and entrepreneurship are transforming business and how the business of technology is transforming the world, providing readers with a deep understanding of venture capital and capital markets. Recognized as an essential resource in today's fast-changing business world, Red Herring gets the right answers before anyone else even thinks to ask the questions. More information on Red Herring is available on the Internet at http://www.redherring.com.

For Information, please contact:

HomeATM: Mitchell Cobrin, COO mcobrin@HomeATM.net
Tel: 514-207-5000


Red Herring: Farley Duvall, Executive Director fduvall@redherring.com
Red Herring Tel: 41.44.445.3490

SOURCE HomeATM
http://www.homeatm.net

Copyright (C) 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

Copyright ©2008 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use. MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc."

Sunday, April 20, 2008

FTVentures Closes $512 Million Fund

Press Release from FTVentures

FTVentures announced on April 16th, the closing of its third and largest fund to date, FTV III, at $512 million. FTVentures will continue its strategy of investing in software and business services companies that derive value from the firm’s unmatched Global Partner Network, which includes the world’s leading financial institutions. Founded in 1998, FTVentures has over $1 billion in committed capital and has offices in San Francisco and New York.

“We greatly appreciate the continued support of our core strategic limited partners,” said Richard Garman, FTVentures Managing Partner. “We are also delighted to have new, highly respected institutions acknowledge our track record and unique model by joining our institutional limited partner group. The addition of traditional investors and new strategic investors to our existing investor network will allow us to continue to deploy our proven model with more diversified sources of capital.”

Consistent with the investment strategy of its previous funds, FTV III will typically invest $10 million to $60 million in software and services companies seeking to finance organic expansion, recapitalizations, build-ups, and buyouts.

The firm’s portfolio companies target the financial services industry as a key customer vertical and leverage FTVentures extensive Global Partner Network in developing commercial relationships.

New limited partners from the financial services industry include Liberty Mutual, Skandia Insurance, Nordea, PartnerRe, Capital One, Fannie Mae and Barclays Global Investors. New traditional limited partners include New York City Retirement Systems, RHM Group, New York State Common Retirement Fund and Kamehameha Schools.

FTVentures is known for the strength of its financial services industry network which includes the following limited partner institutions from the financial industry: AIG, AXA, Bank of America, Barclays Global Investors, BNP Paribas, Capital One, Charles Schwab, CIBC, Citigroup, Comerica, Credit Suisse, DBS, Deutsche Bank, Fannie Mae, Fidelity National Financial, Fifth Third Bank, First Republic Bank, Freddie Mac, GE Capital, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, The Hartford, HSBC, ING, JPMorgan Chase, KeyCorp, Lehman Brothers, Liberty Mutual, Lloyds TSB, Morningstar, National City, Nomura, Nordea, PartnerRe, People’s United Bank, PNC Bank, RBC Royal Bank, Sallie Mae, SEB, Skandia Insurance, Standard Chartered, Travelers, SunTrust, SVB Financial Group, USBancorp, Visa, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, Wells Fargo and Zions Bancorporation.

FTVentures previous successes include Actimize (acquired by NICE Systems), Corillian (IPO/acquired by Checkfree), ExlService (NASDAQ: EXLS), KVS (acquired by VERITAS), PowerShares Capital Management (acquired by AMVESCAP), and Verus (acquired by The Sage Group).

Current FTVentures portfolio companies include Aveksa, Cloudmark, Coremetrics, Covario, Financial Engines, GigaSpaces, GMI, Managed Objects, Rezolve Group, Capital H Group, CMS Holdings Group, Daylight Forensic & Advisory, ETF Securities, Freeborders, Intrepid Learning Solutions, Mavent, MedSynergies, Presidio Reinsurance Group, and ProfitLine.

The FTVentures partners are: Brad Bernstein, Eric Byunn, Ben Cukier, Richard Garman, Jim Hale, David Haynes, Bob Huret, Derek Lemke-von Ammon and Chris Winship.

Contacts
FTVentures
Karen Derr Gilbert, 415-229-3000
kgilbert@ftventures.com

www.ftventures.com

Friday, April 18, 2008

HomeATM Payments News Headlines Ending 4/18


Brought to you via Glenbrook's "Payment News" Website, which was responsible for the compilation and posting of the following links. Clicking on any of the links below will bring you to www.paymentsnews.com where you can read the story in full.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Online Debit Growth Expected to Climb to $93.9 Billion by 2012 - Javelin

As the illustration on the left graphically depicts, PIN Debit is most secure form of debit and HomeATM has positioned itself as a prominent force as online debit is set to skyrocket on the web. The following is from Javelin Strategy and Research...

Alternative payments will account for an increasing percentage of U.S. online transactions by 2012, according to a recent study from Javelin Strategy and Research.

As I reported last week, Debit card online transaction volume will increase to $93.9 billion by 2012, up from $38.8 billion in 2007, accounting for about 26% of total U.S. online transactions, Javelin says. Online debit volume is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 19.3% through 2012.

(Click the illustration to the right to enlarge it, then hit backspace to return)

The growth in online use of debit cards is primarily attributable to the growth in debit card usage in general, although younger consumers are opting for debit cards as a primary online payment option, Javelin says. The emergence of rewards programs linked to signature debit may contribute to growth, according to the study.

Javelin also estimates that online volume from e-mail payment accounts, such as PayPal, will increase to $40 billion by 2012, up from $7.8 billion in 2007, and will represent 11% of total online transaction volume. E-mail account volume, dominated by PayPal, will have a compound annual growth rate of 38% through 2012. Javelin forecasts that the average PayPal transaction at a retail site will reach $40 in 2012, up from $32 in 2007.

Stored-value products—merchant-specific gift cards and network-branded products—will grow at a 43% compound annual growth rate to $32.1 billion in 2012 from $5.4 billion in 2007, Javelin estimates. Stored-value cards will account for about 9% of total U.S. online volume by 2012, propelled by increased growth in multi-channel usage of in-store programs.

In addition, online private label payment card transactions are expected to total $23.7 billion by 2012, up from $5.3 billion in 2007, representing 7% of total online U.S. transaction volume, Javelin says. Private-label transactions will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 35% through 2012.

Editor's Note: If ATMDirect is going to "Own Online PIN Debit" as they mentioned in their "patently absurd" press release, I'd suggest they take little baby steps, the first one being "Acceptance of HomeATM's invitation for a "PIN-OFF" As of right now, they have 27 Days:6 hours and some minutes left to accept. ATMDirect...we're still waiting!

Monday, April 14, 2008

HomeATM Still Waiting To Hear From ATMDirect Regarding "PIN-Off"

In the wake of the Airlines Industry having just become aware that a credit card processor can (and will) dictate that 100% of an airlines credit card based revenue can be withheld, it has become more than obvious that Internet PIN Debit will not only "fly" but will become "air apparent" to the current web transaction space. HATM is more than ready to "earn it's wings".

I am aware how both ATMDirect and HomeATM's Internet PIN Debit solutions work. As a founding member of Pay By Touch, from which Acculink procured ATMDirect, I am privy to specific details driving ATMDirect's solution.

After seeing and learning more about HomeATM's Internet PIN Debit Solution, I am convinced that HomeATM's technology is the strongest of these two.

I am interested in bringing more publicity and thus awareness to PIN Based Internet Transactions. For that reason, when HomeATM, last week, suggested challenging ATMDirect to an industry sponsored showdown which was dubbed by Ken Mages, HomeATM's CEO and Founder, as a "PIN-OFF," I thought it was a brilliant way to drum up some exposure towards furthering the cause of PIN Debit for the Internet.

Of course, it also occurred to me that this was analagous to an old-fashioned duel, ala the Old Wild West...and not unlike the Wild West, this duel may leave only one man (technology) standing.

According to Ken Mages, CEO and Founder of HomeATM, HATM is entirely more than willing to have this so-called "PIN Off" supervised by a knowledgeable, non-partisan entity(ies).

As I mentioned in last weeks blog posting, entitled "HomeATM Officially Challenges ATMDirect to a "PIN-Off," one suggestion (among many) as a "fair and balanced" technological judge/arbitrator was John Stewart" the Editor in Chief of Digital Transactions Magazine. With that said, HomeATM would welcome any and all highly respected industry veteran(s).

Strong candidates might include highly regarded Gartner Research analyst Avivah Litan, Aite Research Director and Analyst, Gwenn Bézard, Glenbrook's Payments News Editor Scott Loftesness, The GreenSheet's President and Founder, Paul Green and/or Internet Retailer Magainzes Publisher, Jack Love.

However, HomeATM is willing to invite any and all analysts to form an "Internet PIN Debit Payments Panel." and oversee the "PIN-Off"

As I see it, the panel's primary function would be to subject both HomeATM's and ATMDirect's methodologies to whatever rigorous tests they may wish to institute to verify how it works, that it works, how secure it is and how quickly the transaction is transacted.

Of course, all I'd ask is that results of these tests be shared (publicly) including each "analysts independent findings" upon the conclusion of conducting these "objectively unbiased analysis".

Say again? Okay. HomeATM is willing to showcase the HomeATM technology to a professional unbiased payments panel...and ATMDirect would be and hereby "is invited" ...to do the same. The results of the evaluation will be public domain.

Will you, ATMDirect accept PIN Debit ? As I posed last week, I think the real question is: Can ATMDirect accept,? If so, will ATMDirect be able to do so "securely" without any glitches? That is the gist of the challenge. My personal belief is the PIN-Off" might be too "Rocky" a road for them to travel. My educated guess is they may want to avoid having their technology subjected to independent analysis as it may die from exposure.

However, I've been known to be wrong before, so...ATMDirect, prove me wrong! If you don't think that HomeATM would "PIN U" into the proverbial corner, feel free to accept the invitation to an offical PIN Off by emailing me at: ATMDirect Hereby Accepts.

We would love (and are anxiously waiting) to hear from you ATMDirect...just accept the challenge sometime within the next 30 days. and we'll make arrangements for the PIN-Off. As a friendly reminder look for the "PIN-Off" Countdown Widget at the top right of this blog!

And every day for the next 30 days, I will let you know if I've yet to hear from or receive an acceptance of the invite to a "PIN Off" from ATMDirect.

You said in your "Press Release" that you will "Own PIN Debit on the Internet," so let's at least see you "Own Up to This Challenge".

I'll be waiting...

External Links to this Post:

www.allpaynews.com

http://www.huliq.com/


Sunday, April 13, 2008

Mayday! Mayday! Mayday!

Yesterday I mentioned that card processor First Data told Frontier they would withhold 100% of their credit card processing fees... starting, May 1st, which ironically is also known as May Day! (Venez m'aider for my Canadian friends!)
The airline industry should see this movement as not only the distress signal that it is, but also a sign of things to come if they don't prepare a plan that protects them from being held, dare I use the word?, "hostage" by credit card processors.

One such plan would include further instituting and utilizing HomeATM's PIN Debit Platform which would eliminate reserves in their entirety and lower their card processing costs significantly.

Today I bring you an article from the Denver Post. Should you desire to do so, click this link which will bring you to thei DP's site where you can read related articles, including comments from readers about this very interesting and "still developing" fiasco.


Here's the story...

Frontier Airlines pointed the finger of blame directly at First Data Corp. for its bankruptcy filing Friday. Greenwood Village-based First Data responded with regrets that "economic conditions" forced the Denver-based airline into reorganization, but otherwise kept quiet.

So how did the two hometown corporations get into a stand-off that will have to be settled in bankruptcy court? Credit-card processors like First Data will ask merchants for more collateral to protect themselves when financial conditions deteriorate. Those same financial stresses, however, make a merchant less able to meet those demands — what some observers call a formula for ankruptcy.

'It happens regularly, particularly with the small and low cost carriers who have so much of their revenues tied up in credit-card transactions to begin with," said Jack Williams, a resident scholar at the American Bankruptcy Institute

Demands from credit-card processors are often the untold story behind many bankruptcies, Williams said, which makes Frontier's public outing of a company it needs to survive so unusual.

When consumers make a credit-card purchase, they have a guarantee from Visa and MasterCard to cover things like defective goods or undelivered services. Merchants get paid quickly even if the actual delivery takes place months later — say an airline or cruise ticket purchased in April for a trip in August. Although Visa and MasterCard offer the guarantees, credit-card processors are on the hook if merchants can't make good. Potential losses can be several times beyond any profits generated.

To protect themselves, credit-card processors require merchants to maintain a reserve, usually funded by holding back a certain percentage of the credit-card receipts they collect. "They are underwriting the risk. They are the ones who will be stuck if the merchant goes down," said Adil Moussa, an analyst with Aite Group, a Boston research firm.

Frontier maintained a $54.5 million credit-card deposit with First Data and one of $18.5 million with American Express, according to the company's bankruptcy filing. Frontier got news in letter Frontier reported that First Data sent it a letter Tuesday lifting the reserve requirement to $130 million. Until Frontier met that higher cap, First Data said it would hold back half of the company's credit-card revenues.

That First Data requires reserves is standard industry practice, and it's also standard to raise them when risks increase, said Jim Daly, a senior editor with Digital Transactions, an industry trade publication.

But lifting reserve requirements sends a loud distress signal to the market. "A 50 percent holdback signals all creditors that it is a serious financial situation and you have an impending bankruptcy," Williams said.

Unable to survive on half rations of cash flow for any length of time, Frontier sought bankruptcy protection. While holdbacks can trigger a bankruptcy filing, they aren't the "cause."
But Moussa questions whether First Data could have handled things differently. "One can't help but wonder if First Data is overreacting and really pushing one of its customers toward bankruptcy," Moussa said. And what happens if all credit-card processors respond to a rash of four airline failures by raising reserve requirements on all carriers, he asks. "It might just be the nail on the coffin for the already ailing industry," he said.

First Data faces pressures of its own. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. acquired the once public company in a leveraged buyout last fall, lifting the debt on its balance sheet from $2.5 billion to more than $22 billion. For 2007, First Data recently reported revenues of $8.1 billion and a loss of $907 million. That compares with revenues of $7.1 billion and a net income of $1.5 billion in 2006.

How First Data deals with merchants is somewhat mechanical, not unlike bank debt covenants, and entirely contractual. But Williams wonders if the entire credit crunch hasn't made all financial players much more fearful, a little quicker to pull the trigger when things turn south.

Despite any public posturing, Frontier and First Data are expected to reach a compromise as quickly as possible and their lawyers are reportedly already talking. The bankruptcy filing also blocks First Data's plans to hold back credit-card revenues. "It is to everyone's benefit to work this out quickly. I'm talking days. It won't go weeks or months," Williams said.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

HomeATM Blog "Week in Review"

Your email updates, powered by FeedBlitz

Click here to start your FREE subscription|

"HomeATM" - 5 new articles

  1. Airlines Can Have 100% of Their Credit Card Transactions Withheld!
  2. Frontier Airlines Blames Credit Card Processor for Bankruptcy Filing
  3. PCI Standards Again Questioned in Wake of New Breach
  4. HomeATM Officially Invites ATMDirect to a "PIN Off"
  5. Study Reveals PIN Debit Provides Lowest Fraud Rate
  6. More Recent Articles
  7. Search HomeATM

Airlines Can Have 100% of Their Credit Card Transactions Withheld!

The credit card processor cited in Frontier Airlines' decision to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, on Friday issued a statement defending its actions. "We regret that the current economic conditions have led to today's bankruptcy filing by Frontier Airlines," Greenwood Village-based First Data said in the statement.

First Data informed Frontier that it would withhold 100 percent of the Denver-based carrier's credit card transactions beginning May 1, said Joe Hodas, spokesman for Frontier. "There was no advance warning," Hodas said. "This has all transpired in the last three days.

Previously, First Data held back 45 percent of the low-cost carriers credit card sales receipts.

The feeling is that Chapter 11 is going allow us the ability to straighten out these financial issues under the protection of the bankruptcy court so that we can emerge a stronger and more long-term viable airline."
But First Data downplayed its role in the situation. "First Data, with our bank partners, processes transactions for a variety of businesses around the world," First Data officials said in a statement. "We continually monitor and manage the credit risks associated with processing transactions in industries where we provide services.

Editor's Note: Here's the scary part for the Airline Industry. Withholding 100% of credit card transaction revenue is apparently considered "standard practice".
The terms of our agreement with Frontier Airlines are not unique; they are considered standard industry practice and terms originally agreed upon by Frontier.
Frontier Airlines is the second-largest airline operating out of Denver International Airport. In 2007, Frontier carried roughly 22.7 percent of passenger enplanements at DIA. The airline will continue operating as it works through Chapter 11, a fact that pleases DIA officials.

"We are pleased that Frontier expects to continue normal operations and will provide full flight schedules for its passengers at Denver International Airport," said DIA's new aviation manager, Kim Day. "Based on conversations I've had with Frontier, I anticipate no immediate impact to the airport's revenues or financial position. Frontier Airlines is our hometown carrier, and it has been a valued partner at DIA since the airport opened. We have full confidence in Frontier's leadership, and we believe it will emerge from this restructuring process in a strong financial position and will remain one of Denver's premier businesses."


Frontier Airlines currently owes DIA $1.7 million, due on April 20. DIA owes Frontier $7 million in net revenue credit and $3.74 in fuel tax credit.

Friday, April 11, 2008

Frontier Airlines Blames Credit Card Processor for Bankruptcy Filing

The Airline Industry, thanks to First Data may now consider HomeATM's PIN Based Platform as their primary payment choice

HomeATM recently signed a deal with Universal Air Travel Plan (UATP) and if anyone was wondering why the Airline Industry is interested in HomeATM's platform, you need to look no further than this mornings announcement that Frontier filed for Chapter 11.

Many will blame the high cost of gasoline, but in fact, the majority of the blame (according to Frontier themselves) is their credit card processor, First Data.

Follow this link to read the letter sent by Frontier's CEO, Sean Menke to it's employees in it's entirety. Otherwise, here's a pertinent excerpt of that letter:

This week, I was notified by our credit card processor that, as of Friday, April 11, due to "current economic conditions, the rise in fuel costs and the other bankruptcies around the industry," they intended to start withholding 50 percent of the credit card funds received from the sale of Frontier tickets.

If they went ahead and did this, tens of millions of dollars owed to us by our customers would have been withheld by the credit card processor, First Data. This would have drained our available cash almost immediately and would have made it impossible for us to continue normal operations.

Therefore, we decided to file Chapter 11 in an effort to fight this unwarranted step by the credit card processor so that we can continue to position the Company for long term success.I want to emphasize to each of you that this was very sudden and unexpected. We are the victims of a credit market that is very fragile and the tolerance for risk is extremely low. As I have stated many times recently, our executive management team has been working diligently and tirelessly to extend our
runway by securing additional cash to bolster our balance sheet. We were successfully making progress on a number of fronts that would position us well for the future and with the protection of the bankruptcy court, we plan to continue to pursue those opportunities.
It's simply amazing to me that a card processor, in order to mitigate "their" risk, instills immediate danger into a company's "very existence" by having control over funds that were not theirs to begin with. The time has apparently come for airlines to position PIN Debit, (not as an alternative payment), but as their primary payment mechanism. Here's more from Bloomberg...

Frontier took the step after its credit-card processor, First Data Corp., began withholding proceeds from ticket sales, the Denver-based carrier said in a statement today. First Data told Frontier April 8 it would retain half the proceeds of bankcard sales and increase collateral to $130 million from $54.5 million, according to a statement by Frontier Vice President Edward Christie filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan. If First Data's hold on proceeds went unchecked, ``it would have put severe restraints on Frontier's liquidity and would have made it impossible for us to continue normal operations.'' Menke said. First Data is based in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

I'll include more detail in next week's blog posting(s) but suffice it to say that PIN Based Transactions not only "eliminate the reserve" instituted by credit card processors, but also "lowers the transaction rate" (Interchange Fees) significantly.

Airlines are on the very brink and the issue of credit card reserves is going to explode in this space (if not in their face, as it has for Frontier) if the airlines industry doesn't start taking the necessary steps required to switch their payment choice over to the lower cost, more secure PIN Based transactional methodology that "their partner" HomeATM offers.

First Data actions today could not have driven this point home (or should I say HomeATM) any more clearly.

PCI Standards Again Questioned in Wake of New Breach

Interestingly, the brick and mortar world, (the one chock full of PCI Standard compliance demands), seems less secure than the Online world. Yet online retailers pay exhorbitantly higher fees than brick and mortar retailers. Card Not Present transactions are certainly higher risk transactions, but HomeATM's Internet PIN Debit platform, combined with their PIN Entry Device (PED) could cut risk significantly and thus save online retailers 100 basis points off their Interchange fees.

In yet another breach, this one from Advanced Auto Parts, Retail Wire questions whether or not we should move to Chip and PIN based transactions.

Here's the discussion in today's Retail Wire...

And yet again, an American retailer and its customers go down the road of data theft. In this case, the retailer is Advance Auto Parts and the most recent hack affected 56,000 of its shoppers in eight states - Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, Ohio, Tennessee and Virginia. Luckily, the customers from the stores in question represent a small portion of the total shoppers that frequent the chain's 3,261 stores across the country.

The discovery of the breach, as with those at other retailers, has prompted Advance to reassess its security measures. Others, at the same time, are once again questioning if Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance standards are either fair or effective.

In a recent interview with RIS News, Dave Hogan, senior vice president and chief information officer with the National Retail Federation (NRF), expressed the view that more secure forms of payment such as "Chip & Pin" were available and proven in reducing fraud. He suggested that card associations should "provide (at no cost to the merchant) card readers that can accept these new types of cards."

Mr. Hogan also took issue with the amount of data that merchants are required to keep by banks. He called on financial institutions to "state that 'Retailers have the option to no longer store credit card data and they will not be penalized for not keeping credit card data."

To read the Retail Wire discussion, click here. I'm sure it will garner a lot of responses. Here is one from Evan Shuman, former eWeek contributor and StoreFrontBackTalk Editor:

To answer your question, yes, Hogan's concerns are quite reasonable. Much of this, though, is a lot of agreement on the easy issues. There are few who truly argue with the following:

1) PCI is not perfect and retailers who are fully compliant are still fully vulnerable. Even PCI's backers agree with this. PCI was never intended to be perfect security. PCI was never intended to be anything beyond a good starting point.

2) PCI has absolutely improved retail security today. Again, this is pretty much done unanimous. It's not gone nearly far enough, but any movement forward is good.

3) Banks are, for the most part, much better choices than retailers to store sensitive payment data. Again, no one ultimately quarrels with this. The issue involves infrastructure, politics and business costs. To make this transition would require tons of agreement from people who are not motivated to make such agreements. So arguing that it's better doesn't help much if it can't be done given the powers that be.

4) Chip and PIN is more secure than what much of the U.S. is doing. True. But Chip and PIN--as it's deployed in the U.K.--also has many issues. Making the transition would be costly, would meet with substantial infrastructure resistance AND it would still retailers far more exposed than is desirable. For the same extreme effort and cost, we could probably come up with a more secure approach.

It's also true that if all retailers strictly adhered to the common-sense rules (no default passwords, examine traffic logs routinely and seriously, strictly enforce procedures, etc.), we'd also be far better off.

This, however, doesn't address the Hannaford scenario where--based on currently available information--we have a retailer that indeed appeared to abide by all of the rules and still got burned by some aggressive cyber thieves. That's the more rare but far more frightening scenario.

Evan Schuman, Editor, StorefrontBacktalk.com

Thursday, April 10, 2008

HomeATM Officially Invites ATMDirect to a "PIN Off"

I was speaking with Ken Mages, the founder and CEO of HomeATM and George Gendron, HomeATM's President regarding ATMDirect's questionable press release (Smoke, Mirrors and Patents) last Sunday, and the notion of calling them on their bluff came up.

Additionaly, we discussed an article written by Digital Transaction News, whereby Rajiv Grover, an investor in ATMDirect said. “Our intention is to own Internet PIN debit transactions.”

Remember...I took at close look at ATMDirect when it went up for auction and when I began digging into ATMDirect's business my conclusion was that the asset value of the associated personal property (i.e. servers, networking equipment, computers and office equipment) was worth (in an eBay resale) between $500,000 and $750,000.

Freshly armed with this information I decidedly looked at their associated, and I use this term very loosely here, "intellectual property" which solely consisted of a single patent. (not 25 global patents as stated in ATMDirect's recent press release)

In what I consider to be a "more than bold" statement, the new owners of ATMDirect went on to say: "Over the course of the next 90 to 120 days, ATM Direct is set to contract with a major, publicly held acquirer to sign merchants, receive certifications from a couple of major electronic-funds transfer networks, and sign a number of large merchants...

This leads me to my point. I have a "common sense" question that I'd like to pose here. By the way, it's the same question I posed to myself when I decided not to move forward in my attempt to acquire ATMDirect.

But before posing the question, I would ask that you first take a look at the numbers shown in the graphic on the left. (to get a bigger picture of my point, click the picture and focus on the "debit". Okay, now on with my ponderings...

For a measly $600k, wouldn't one, or even you, think that PayPal, BillMeLater, Amazon, First Data, Heartland, CyberSource, (the list goes on forever) would have been interested in acquiring the assets of ATMDirect? If any of those aforementioned companies could have "Owned PIN Debit on the Internet," a $94 BILLION dollar market for only $600k, doesn't your common sense dictate that they would have been involved?

For obvious reasons ALL were glaringly absent.

Thus the only logical assumption that a pragmatic person can make is that there's nothing there. Which brings me back to the beginning of this post.

I was talking with both the CEO/Founder and President of HomeATM, and the notion of calling them on their bluff (Myth'd it By That Much...) came up.

The fairest and most arbitrary way would be to challenge them to an old-fashioned showdown which was dubbed during the course of our conversation, a "PIN-OFF."

HomeATM would be willing to have the "PIN Off" supervised by a knowledgeable, non-partisan entity. One suggestion among many as a "fair and balanced" arbitrator was John Stewart" the Editor in Chief of Digital Transactions Magazine.

Will you, ATMDirect accept? I think the real question is: Will ATMDirect even "be able" to accept? If so, will ATMDirect be able to do so "securely" without any glitches? That is the gist of the challenge.

My take is they won't. It's too "Rocky" a road for them to travel. They know that it's simply a case of the Contender vs. the Pretender...

...Everlast versus Never...mind...I think you get the picture!

However, I've been known to be wrong before, so...ATMDirect, prove me wrong! If you don't think that HomeATM would "PIN U" into the proverbial corner, feel free to accept the invitation to an offical PIN Off by emailing me at: ATMDirect Hereby Accepts

Disqus for ePayment News