Government looks hypocritical over this game of skill.
George Will: A call for online poker | StarTribune.com
Howard Lederer, aka "the Professor," is a professional poker player, not a gambler. If Congress will acknowledge this distinction, it will rectify a recent mistake.
In 2006, Congress, cloaking cunning with moralizing, effectively outlawed Internet gambling by making it illegal for banks or credit-card companies to process payments to online gambling operations. This was more than moral pork for social conservatives. It also blocked online competitors from poaching gamblers from the nation's most aggressive promoters of gambling -- state governments, which are increasingly addicted to revenues raised by lotteries and from taxation of other legal gambling.
Having turned gambling, which once was treated as a sin, into a social policy, government looks unusually silly criminalizing online forms of it. Granted, some people gamble excessively (although not nearly as many people as eat excessively). Granted, gambling becomes addictive to a small minority (although it is not nearly as addictive as smoking and drinking). Granted, gambling is morally dubious when it is only the unproductive pursuit of wealth without work (although gambling is productive of pleasure for tens of millions of Americans for whom it is a frequent pastime). But never mind whether government should try to tightly circumscribe a ubiquitous human activity that generally harms nobody.
Continue Reading
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vxdsuecb8-jlPfaT9taDUQAf3mNxhiKZw_UdyBFaLmcMxyDp60eHY74FCQ4QFrMAfOUGZeFObo_LWDYEUtS6efYZ6rQ0-1NuEJfDaV5mQcNE1GvgHXwKYpp925UlkN19GCgPiqu80gZoP0R9C-3ZQ=s0-d)
